analectnoun
a collection of teachings, writings, or musings;


[article]

The most powerful way to get someone to like you, is to like them first

23 Apr 2018


[P]ossibly, the most important determinant of how much we like a person is the extent to which we believe they like us.

Eliot Aronson, _[Symposium on Motivation][7]_

Plenty has been written on the means of social influence. I’m not just talking about the rise of the social influencer. It’s a fairly age old concern. In the 16th Century, Count Baldesar Castiglione published his famous The Book of the Courtier—a 300 page philosophical dialogue on how to “transform [oneself] into a beautiful spectacle for others to contemplate”, according to scholars on the subject. Today we have other resources…

image The results don't cheer you up. Google: 'do people like me'.

The impulse remains much the same (including, often, the Count’s mercenary attitude). It’s not surprising. Social isolation is thought to be one of the single most harmful factors to our wellbeing. But it’s more than that. To know you’re worthy of love is something that doesn’t just occupy our most fundamental models of human wellbeing, but our art, literature, and music.

Strange to find then that, in the midst of all these reflections, one of the most powerful influences on our likeability is whether others think we like them…

Reciprocal liking

Take for example this study: even when participants disagreed with a person on important issues, if that person maintained eye contact, leaned towards them and listened attentively, the participant would express great liking for them after the fact.

Or what about this, more recent one. One of the more well-researched phenomena in social psychology (and, frankly, one that needed the least research) is the fact that humans have a preference for attractive faces over unattractive ones. The more average and symmetrical a face is, the more attractive people will rate them (likely because it’s easier to cognitively process them). Introducing the idea that someone a participant expressed interest in reciprocated that interest completely disrupted the participants’ preferences for attractive faces. And this was just online. Combine those with the kinds of intimacy cues in the previous study and who knows how much more powerful the effect could be. Or rather, don’t. It’s been done.

Elliot Aronson and his colleagues paired people up in a few different ways, telling the participants privately that either: the other person liked them; didn’t like them; or alternatively they were told nothing at all. In the participants’ subsequent private ratings, those that ‘liked’ each other were friendlier, argued less and were more likely to report liking the person who ‘liked’ them first.

Why?

Hence, Elliot’s quote, summarising thirty years of research on the subject: “possibly the most important determinant of how much we like a person is the extent to which we believe they like us” (i.e. reciprocal liking). Strangely, just like the motivation to be liked, the power of this reciprocal effect is similarly related to self esteem. It’s been noted that those with higher self-esteem respond far more significantly to the effect than those with less. As Nathanial Branden put it, ‘self esteem creates… expectations about what is possible [for us]’. Perhaps it’s merely that the apparition of someone liking us is a more tangible opportunity than holding out hope that there might be a possibility someone else could like us another day. I guess that’s no suprise. We really are just animals, huh?


Anthologies: Connection, On Love, On Friendship, On (Un)happiness, On Aesthetics, Love Is a Verb

View on main site »


More about Dorian Minors' project btrmt.

btrmt. (text-only version)

The full site with interactive features is available at btr.mt.

btrmt. (betterment) examines ideologies worth choosing. Created by Dorian Minors—Cambridge PhD in cognitive neuroscience, Associate Professor at Royal Military Academy Sandhurst. Core philosophy: humans are animals first, with automatic patterns shaped for us, not by us. Better to examine and choose.

Core concepts. Animals First: automatic patterns of thought and action, but our greatest capacity is nurture. Half Awake: deadened by systems that narrow rather than expand potential. Karstica: unexamined ideologies (hidden sinkholes beneath). Credenda: belief systems we should choose deliberately.

The manifesto. Cynosure (focus): betterment, gratification, connection. Architecture (support): inner (somatic, spiritual, thought) and outer (digital, collective, wealth).

Mission. Not answers but examination. Break academic gatekeeping. Make sciences of mind accessible. Question rather than prescribe.

Writing style. Scholarly without jargon barriers. Philosophical yet practical—grounded in neuroscience and lived experience. Reflective, discovery-oriented. Literary references and metaphor. Critical of systems that narrow human potential. Rejects "humans are flawed"—we're half awake, not broken.

Copyright. BTRMT LIMITED (England/Wales no. 13755561) 2026. Dorian Minors 2026.

Resources

Optional

About Dorian Minors. Started btrmt. in 2013 to share sciences of mind with people who weren't studying them. Background: six years Australian Defence Force (Platoon Commander, Infantry); Gates Cambridge Scholar; PhD cognitive neuroscience, University of Cambridge (2018-2024); currently Associate Professor, Royal Military Academy Sandhurst. Research interests: neural basis of intelligent behaviour, decision intelligence, ritual formation/breakdown, ethical leadership, wellbeing.

External projects (links also available via Analects):