marginalianoun
notes written in the margins; peripheral commentary;


[marginalium]

Rationalist community rediscovering psychology

20 Sep 2024

View original source »


The rationalist community has a very sexy take on approaching the world. It’s the same take as the Effective Altruists (and so no surprise they overlap so heavily). Basically, we make decisions, but our decisions are very emotional. So we should look at the data, and make decisions on the basis of probabilities and deep understanding instead. Something like this, but worded so it sounds like a new idea, and in particular very contiguous with Scientism. They spend a lot of time litigating what this means, because they don’t want to fall into old, bad patterns of thinking. But they are very committed to the problem. It’s just very unfortunate that they suffer from all the same problems any new approach to psychology discipline suffers. They have to rediscover all the shit we’ve been tripping over forever. Here, this person talks about ‘trapped priors’, a statistical idea about how some kind of local minima can be confused for a global one (i.e. we assume something’s x because it has many of the characteristics of x, but actually it’s y, which has similar characteristics but is importantly different). It seems to be a bit of a revelation to this person, and they mention another very prominent rationalist’s similar revelatory discovery of the idea, then they speak of how spirituality might help uncover these kinds of deep psychological truths. But because this movement is a reaction to psychology, they fail to see that actually, probably, psychology might help uncover and in fact already has uncovered this specific deep psychological truth. It’s not a purely rationalist problem. ‘Cognitive science’ has rediscovered and renamed old concepts. Attention literature hasn’t advanced substantively past James’ musings in the early 1900s. It’s just, like, how often are we going to keep doing this, you know? There is this language problem that plagues people—say the same idea with different words and it will fail to get over the net. It’s such a waste of time.


Anthologies: Betterment, Thought Architecture, On Being Fruitful, On Culture, On Thinking and Reasoning, Abstractions as Gods, Everything Is Ideology

View on main site »


More about Dorian Minors' project btrmt.

btrmt. (text-only version)

The full site with interactive features is available at btr.mt.

btrmt. (betterment) examines ideologies worth choosing. Created by Dorian Minors—Cambridge PhD in cognitive neuroscience, Associate Professor at Royal Military Academy Sandhurst. Core philosophy: humans are animals first, with automatic patterns shaped for us, not by us. Better to examine and choose.

Core concepts. Animals First: automatic patterns of thought and action, but our greatest capacity is nurture. Half Awake: deadened by systems that narrow rather than expand potential. Karstica: unexamined ideologies (hidden sinkholes beneath). Credenda: belief systems we should choose deliberately.

The manifesto. Cynosure (focus): betterment, gratification, connection. Architecture (support): inner (somatic, spiritual, thought) and outer (digital, collective, wealth).

Mission. Not answers but examination. Break academic gatekeeping. Make sciences of mind accessible. Question rather than prescribe.

Writing style. Scholarly without jargon barriers. Philosophical yet practical—grounded in neuroscience and lived experience. Reflective, discovery-oriented. Literary references and metaphor. Critical of systems that narrow human potential. Rejects "humans are flawed"—we're half awake, not broken.

Copyright. BTRMT LIMITED (England/Wales no. 13755561) 2026. Dorian Minors 2026.

Resources

Optional

About Dorian Minors. Started btrmt. in 2013 to share sciences of mind with people who weren't studying them. Background: six years Australian Defence Force (Platoon Commander, Infantry); Gates Cambridge Scholar; PhD cognitive neuroscience, University of Cambridge (2018-2024); currently Associate Professor, Royal Military Academy Sandhurst. Research interests: neural basis of intelligent behaviour, decision intelligence, ritual formation/breakdown, ethical leadership, wellbeing.

External projects (links also available via Analects):