[marginalium]
A response to MacAskill’s What We Owe the Future
16 Mar 2023
A response to MacAskill’s What We Owe the Future. Right at the very end:
While MacAskill is highly interested in great power war (pp. 114-116), he is curiously uninterested in how to theorize explicitly about great power politics in the context of international institutions despite these being the causal source of the main factor in the probabilities he bandies about throughout the book. Throughout his argument, he tacitly black-boxes what he calls “the international system,” “international cooperation,” “international coordination” and “international norms.” (Obviously, he could claim that great power politics is independent from international institutions and shaped by the interactions of small number of elite actors—something he hints at in his historical examples; but it is not developed in his future oriented chapters.) And so, somewhat curiously, a book devoted to building a social movement and changing values, leaves under-theorized the main social factor that will determine (by its own lights) the possibility of that movement having a future at all
Anthologies: Betterment, Collective Architecture, On Culture, On Leadership, On Politics and Power, Absit Omnia, Moral Terrain