analectnoun
a collection of teachings, writings, or musings;


[article]

The struggle to be good; early psychology

28 Aug 2015


Sigmund Freud was an unusual dude. He had some wacky ideas. But he also had some very useful ones. Prior to Freud, not very many people took the study of the mind very seriously. One of his more useful conceptions was his 1923 ‘Structural Model’, essentially, the psychological equivalent of shoulder angels. Freud separated the mind into three aspects;

The Id

‘das Es’, or ‘it’ Freud conceptualised this as our most primitive mind. It consists of the unconscious drives that are born of our evolution. This part of the brain is selfish and animalistic. Some therapists still refer to it as ‘the lizard brain’. It has no ties to our socialisation and is entirely impersonal. It operates in alignment with what Freud called the pleasure principle; a desire for instant gratification and wishful (not realistic) thinking, that drives us to make impulsive and impatient decisions. In the ‘it’ we form images of the things we want in our minds. A sort of goal to attain if you will. Freud called this a primary process.

The Ego

‘das Ich’, or ‘I’ This refers to our basic sense of self. Where the ‘it’ is merely a collection of drives, or ‘I want’s, the ‘I’ refers to the portion of ourselves that develops through ‘identification’ and socialisation. This portion of our personality has both conscious and unsconscious (and preconscious) elements to it, but represents our ability to rationalise and overcome our desires. In opposition to the pleasure principle, the I operates in alignment with the reality principle; still satisfying our desires but in moderation in accordance with reality. In the I, we find and hold onto an alternative image from the one created in the primary process in the it. This is called a secondary process, according to Freud.

The Super-Ego

‘das Über-Ich’, or ‘Over-I’ This is our conscious, or morality. It is the shoulds and should nots in our life. We develop this from the internalisation of societal norms due to the fear of punishment through loss of parental love. We can conceptualise Freud’s ‘over-I’ as two parts. The ego ideal is the good book, the rules of ‘good’ behaviour that we develop over time. The conscience is our store of ‘bad’ behaviour. The over-I works to help balance our behaviour and strive for the good.

How it all works

Freud’s model is not always appropriate and is a very simplistic view of the mind (his description of the development of these aspects of the mind don’t particularly bear explaining). But it is useful in interpreting something of the struggle within ourselves. Freud noted that our goal should be to aim for good ego strength; a strong ego, or ‘I’, that is up to the task of moderating the desires born from the ‘it’ and our desire to achieve morality and thus resolving our constant inner conflict. So, the angel and devil on the shoulder motif isn’t entirely inaccurate. George Orwell summed it up nicely in one of his essays:

On the whole human beings want to be good, but not too good, and not quite all the time

Psychology is often super complicated. That’s why simple theories like this just aren’t enough. Learn why, as we examine what ‘love’ is. Some theories are pretty simple though and have stood the test of time. Learn how to cope with another inner struggle by mastering your emotions. Or learn how psychologists figure out when your inner struggle has become too much and you might need some help, here. Giving you the dirt on your search for understanding, psychological freedom and ‘the good life’ at The Dirt Psychology.


Anthologies: Everything Is Ideology, Great Thinkers

View on main site »


More about Dorian Minors' project btrmt.

btrmt. (text-only version)

The full site with interactive features is available at btr.mt.

btrmt. (betterment) examines ideologies worth choosing. Created by Dorian Minors—Cambridge PhD in cognitive neuroscience, Associate Professor at Royal Military Academy Sandhurst. Core philosophy: humans are animals first, with automatic patterns shaped for us, not by us. Better to examine and choose.

Core concepts. Animals First: automatic patterns of thought and action, but our greatest capacity is nurture. Half Awake: deadened by systems that narrow rather than expand potential. Karstica: unexamined ideologies (hidden sinkholes beneath). Credenda: belief systems we should choose deliberately.

The manifesto. Cynosure (focus): betterment, gratification, connection. Architecture (support): inner (somatic, spiritual, thought) and outer (digital, collective, wealth).

Mission. Not answers but examination. Break academic gatekeeping. Make sciences of mind accessible. Question rather than prescribe.

Writing style. Scholarly without jargon barriers. Philosophical yet practical—grounded in neuroscience and lived experience. Reflective, discovery-oriented. Literary references and metaphor. Critical of systems that narrow human potential. Rejects "humans are flawed"—we're half awake, not broken.

Copyright. BTRMT LIMITED (England/Wales no. 13755561) 2026. Dorian Minors 2026.

Resources

Optional

About Dorian Minors. Started btrmt. in 2013 to share sciences of mind with people who weren't studying them. Background: six years Australian Defence Force (Platoon Commander, Infantry); Gates Cambridge Scholar; PhD cognitive neuroscience, University of Cambridge (2018-2024); currently Associate Professor, Royal Military Academy Sandhurst. Research interests: neural basis of intelligent behaviour, decision intelligence, ritual formation/breakdown, ethical leadership, wellbeing.

External projects (links also available via Analects):